September 30, 2005

Tc Boyle's Tooth and Claw, almost enough to stand up a movie

    To squash the prospects of a movie evening and enchain the reader to its pages, a novel must be either a plot-driven page-turner or the dispenser of something absent from film.  That something is the human tangle of thoughts, impressions and feelings which no visual medium can ever zoom in on close enough to reveal. TC Boyle’s new short story collection Tooth and Claw has almost enough of it to keep a movie-goer home on a Friday evening.   
    At a reading, two weeks ago, the author conveyed that this meticulous attention to character had developed over 26 years and 16 works as his “nuts and bolts” focus on his writing style ebbed out.  I would rather say he had conserved his fresh similes and cast them into psychological portraiture.
    Appropriately, most of his stories resemble psychological lab test records.  He places a character in an extreme physical situation and notes down his mental reactions.  
In The Swift Passage of the Animals, Zach and his girlfriend are trapped in a snowstorm on the road to a romantic hiking week end.  Zach’s thoughts are sprinkled on all the plot’s nudges.  Before their life-threatening wade through the snow, he registers her conversation on eels : “the dynamics of her voice […], the soft sexy scratch of it shot from his eardrums right to his crotch.” Here Comes meanders through a bum’s sensual stimulations on the streets of California, from “beautiful girls with their hair and everything else bouncing in the shattered light” to vodka and hunger: “his stomach clenched around a little ball of nothing.”  A large portion of the stories’ protagonists are driven by funerals, family and their own lazyness back to drugs.
    TC Boyle effortlessly adapts his writing style to each character while preserving its pungency.  In Blinded by the Sun, he slips on the Spanish, Catholic background of his pampas ranch owner like a new shirt.  In The Doubtfulness of Water, his humorous and appropriate vocabulary renders bearable the constant fuss of a snotty English widow during her horse ride from Boston to New York.  She reacts to a scene in a tavern: “the woman spoke of her privates as if they were public […]and she had to take her book and sit in the courtyard amongst the flies, which were especially thick here, as if they’d gathered for some sort of convention.”
    The most enjoyable short stories propel the reader in the blur between reality and science fiction.  Dogology dispenses a whiff of life as a dog.  It breaks into the thoughts of a woman trying to live as a canine.  It gallops on all fours, sticks its nose in compost and rolls in tattered clothes, just like her.  In The Kind Assassin, a radio host sets out to break the world record of sleepless days and nights.  His rest-less impressions envelop the reader like the real-life experience.
    This story is one of the most delectable in the collection.  It successfully interweaves the sting of suspense—will he make the record?—with equally intense description.  But the weaving masterpiece that would stop any movie-goer in his tracks is Chicxulub.  It chronicles a father’s evening, from stoned foreplay with his wife, through the phone call announcing his daughter is in a hospital and finally to the operation room.  Just before the curve of every crucial moment, statistics on the meteor Chicxulub chanting the insignificance of human existence, slice through and torture.
    The previous stories add a firm dose of page-turning plot to the wrenching subjectivity.  The rest are delicious reads, but TC Boyle’s writing style and vivid impersonations are not quite enough to stand up film.  Maybe in his next work they will be.

Posted by Aventurina King at 06:01:27 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

September 26, 2005

Zhang Yimou continued: Red Sorghum, Ju Dou and Raise the Red Lantern

    As promised, I am slowly but surely crawling up the list of Zhang Yimou films.  Last week crept through Ju Dou and Raise the Red Lantern.    The plot and his themes of his three first films mirror each other, which is strange considering that they were adapted from three different novels.  They all open with an unhappy bride (gorgeous actress Gong Li) sent far away by foot or sedan into the clutches of a senile rich creep. 

    These remnants of man are not even granted their minute of fame.  This is because they are not characters, not individuals whose wrinkles and idiosynchrasies distinguish them from the rest.  Their grins and crumpled features are mere recipients for what they symbolize:  the myriad-faced oppression in the chinese family's patriarchal dictatorship.  In Raise the Red Lantern, the dark cloaked figure of the master paces in and out of the long shots like an haunting spirit.  His face is hidden by the distance or when the distance is reduced becomes the back of the head.  Instead his rumbling voice over(similar to the voice of god in Moses) hangs over the frame and weighs down on the four concubines who vie for his attention like lab rats fighting for their fodder.

    In the second act, Gong Li stabs at patriarchy, whether it be making love to one of her husband's servants (like in red sorghum and ju dou) or pretending she's pregnant to entrap her husband's favours and triumph over the other wives.  This works out well in Red Sorghum but in the two others sends gong li free falling to death or insanity.

    In Ju Dou, Gong Li is tortured by her husband--every night he saddles her, whips her and pours hot tea over her bandaged face.  She quickly realizes that his interpretation of the Kamasutra won't get her pregnant.  One afternoon, when her husband goes out, she falls upon his skeletal helper in the duying factory.   (This is another trend in these films, gorgeous women are surrounded by and coupled with mediocre featured men)He thrusts her onto a board in the factory and make love as ripples of red fabric pour on her face.  She gives birth to a son, the identity of the father remaining a secret until  the old man leg's are paralyzed by some unfortnate adventure with his mule on the mountain side and the illicit couple become the masters and opressors of the dwelling.  The son though continues believing his father is an old senile man locomoting his way around the place in a hybrid of a wine barrel and rollerskates.  The ancient dies, accidentally toppled wheel chair and all in the red dye tank by the four year old son.  but oppression is an everlasting ghost which reincarnates itself in another container once the first dies.  the son himself grows into the role his surrogate father, darting mean looks on the relationship between his mother and real father.  A few years ahead, he topples the later in the same red tank or dye, this time, it's on purpose.

    What mainly struck me in Raise the Red Lantern, after viewing the two previous films was the change in setting.  Red Sorghum and Ju Dou's plots evolved in the open countryside: bounderless fields of swaying red sorghum,  blue sky and sun sheened mountains.  Raise the Red Lantern is all the opposite, its characters are trapped in a tetris of massive stone walls and rows of doorways on whose mise-en-abime the camera meditates.  The latter prefers to be motionless favoring high up spots with an eagle's eye view of the enclosed courtyards or crouching under one wall of red-lantern-light-gorged bedrooms.  The seasons rollover to the rythm of the calligraphy titles and the concubines increasingly vicious attacks on each other.

      The characters' prospects worsen and their amount of smiles decreases with every film.  But the quality of the product increases, plot schemes become more subtle and intricate.  Subplots multiply and interweave among each other.  Flamboyant colors flood over every frame like the dyed water in Ju Dou.  Onwards with To Live (I have to lay off The Story of Qiu Ju until I make a productive trip down to china town)

Posted by Aventurina King at 04:01:13 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

September 25, 2005

Forty Shades of Blue

     There are worse families than ours and certain films are out there to prove it.  Ira Sachs' new aesthetically challenged and attention-span challenging film, Forty Shades of Blue is successful at least in that respect.

     

     The father, Allen Jones (Rip Torn) is an ancient music legend who successfully enacts the local playboy role despite his hefty belly and a beard as scraggly as the third act King Lear's.  His skeletal Russian girlfriend Laura (Dina Korzun) floats around their Memphis mansion jangling her gold bracelets, a wine glass spilling through her lip-gloss.  Their three year old Sam sleeps in a bedroom somewhere.  And then, late off the plane strolls Allen's first son.  Michael is a dashing but pensive high school English teacher whose arrival instantly heats up the mansion's cold hell.  The ensuing humorless plot chronicles the ripples of Laura and Michael's collision of the minds.

     The first scenes drag through one of Allen's parties.  Ira Sachs' obsessively used short lens camera pastes Laura's figure in a crowd of cronies swaying to her boyfriend's music and flat-humored yelps.  Allen then abandons her rigid figure and slips off to ingratiate a plumper singer with a joint and his beard.  Their laughter impresses on the soft rumble of soul music sifted into the hotel room.  Laura's music is silence vanishing into the moan of the piano.  It hangs over her tipsy return home from the party and her frequent makeup touch ups.

    

     Enter Michael and her face suddenly overflows with a bubbling smile and hungry eyes.  Her laughing voice grabs at his attention.  He relinquishes it to her and the (up to then) pretty face who leaned on her rich man's sleeve pulls out a profound and conflicted mind like a rabbit out of a top hat.  She is torn between the material debt she owes her cheating husband—"I don't have a right to complain" she murmurs to Michael in the intimate night of her car "perhaps it is Russian, to keep on going"—and her growing lust for Michael.  Her character comes to life even though the crash into empathy-land is too brutal.

    

     What is really at stake in the movie though is not whether the poor woman will pick herself out of her psychological tangle but if, and how long it will take her to be tangled in Michael's limbs.  She finally is.  It is a disappointing sequence: two heads bumping each other and breathing louder and louder until they exhale like a deflating party balloon. 

     During this scene, the camera sticks to the heads like an embarrassed witness who inadvertently got stuck in the same room as them. 

    

     In general, camera movement and attempts to make the film aesthetically pleasing are minimal.  Forty Shades of Blue slaloms effortlessly through the fabrics of its characters minds.  But it never comes out of the cerebral and the elements essential to its visual medium remain lackluster. 

 

 

Posted by Aventurina King at 03:40:30 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

September 21, 2005

Hong GaoLiang or Red Sorghum

Jiu Er is getting married.  Her mother bussles around her, slipping jewellery on her arm, plucking her eyebrows, throwing the traditional chinese red veil over her face.  This is 1930 in the Chinese countryside, there are no cars, Jiu Er on a cart carried by six men cross the desert and a shimmering field of red sorghum to her leprous husband's dwelling, a red sorghum wine factory.

The marriage was arranged after Jiu Er's family received a mule.  Fortunately, during a brief attempt of robbery, Jiu Er sends sustained longing glances to one of the bull-necked carriers.  Whether he understands what she actually wanted remains doubtful, but he responds in his own way.  A few days later, he kidnaps her for a few hours and makes love to her in the red sorghum.  She lies, as though defeated by him, her red dress impressing starkly on the sorghum reeds bowing over her.  He kneels before her laid body as though in worship.  The camera shies away from all actions sexual (never do we see her jiu er kiss him during the film), instead, the sorghum reeds violently thrashing against the wind and the waning sun become a metaphor for the act.

Ritual and sacrifice recur throughout the film, emerging here and there like rocks in the current of a stream.  A few days later, the husband mysteriously dies, it is sorghum wine season and jiu er--she has inherited her husband's possessions--and the staff of the factory receive the beverage with a chant.  They stand erect, razing their gaze to the heavens, once they have finished singing, they drink up and smash the bowl in front of them. 

A few years of peace intrude, Jiu Er and her lover's son grows to the age of nine and jumps in and out of the sorghum wine pots with nothing but an apron covering his chest.  But the chant is picked up once again after yet another death, that of their friend at the hands of the japanese.  The inhabitants of the factory once more gulp up the wine and set out to avenge their companion.

Posted by Aventurina King at 05:36:35 | Permanent Link | Comments (1) |

September 19, 2005

A dire situation's remedy

Here in New York, I am in a dire situation, that is my blog is in a dire situation.  Explanation:

What kind of content does an interesting, intellectually edifying blog have?  Of course there's the usual Two-minutes-ago-I-got-up-I-switched-on-the-computer-and-now-I'm-writing-type of blog.  And don't get me wrong, that can be interesting, if you're dealing with a person that has an amazingly interesting life (ex: I-got-up-this-morning-and-saved-the-world-before-lunch type of blog).  This is what justified my blogging in China, because then, my life was out-of-the ordinary.  I saw things that most of my potential readership hasn't seen, I could clear or confirm the suspicions which festers around the words 'communist country'.

Unfortunately, back here in New York, I am a mere college student, no more a demographic rarity.  I could blog reviews of cultural events around the city, like I did before going to China in June. But let's face it, if people want to peruse criticism of Western entertainment, they will buy (or rather look up on the internet) the New Yorker, the New York Times or any other of the publications that have professional reviewers who have been writing about their subjects for longer than I have lived.

These past few days, I have therefore been on a mission to scout out what I could write about that could constitute original subject matter.  This semester's chinese class provided the grail to my quest.

It is an independant study course, where me (the intruder) and twelve chinese native speakers research a suject in chinese culture and then write up a thesis and a presentation about it in Chinese.  I have decided to compare the works and lives of film makers Zhang Yimou and Chen Kaige. 

In 1986 (the year of my birth), they succesfully collaborated on Yellow Earth, one of the first Chinese mainland movies to use artistic shot compositions and non linear plot.  Cinematographer Zhang Yimou and director Chen Kaige's artistic visions complimented each other in this piece.

Just a few years later, Zhang Yi Mou was directing the kung-fu kicking, plot obsessed Hero whereas Chen Kaige produced the artsy, esoteric Life on a String.  Both movies have flamboyant colors and compositions as minutely thought over and effective as a Rothko, but their themes and audiences are completely different.  I am mystified, why did initially twin visioned directors apprehend modern film so differently?  

There you go, this is what I will try to answer over the next few months, so there will be plenty of reviews of each director's movies along with commentaries on how their works fit in the broader schemes of their existence (i am anticipating academic vague language to express the fact that I have no idea where this is going to go).

Posted by Aventurina King at 03:45:43 | Permanent Link | Comments (1) |

September 02, 2005

Degas and the Bean Town

How do you maximize your time in new city? Most will opt for the following sequence: walking around historic buildings and taking pictures of them, walking inside of museums, tasting local food, getting lost, refusing the title tourist and assuming the same habits as the locals in order to breathe in the atmosphere of the town. All this gets more complicated when the city is both a vacation venue and an opportunity to see old friends (as in friends of "long date"). One has to selectively divvy up time, put some aside to do some tourism, refrain from the social impulse all human creatures feel to be around their kin and not in some musty museum alone looking at an earless auto-portrait of van Gogh. Well I wasn't that good at dividing my time up in Boston, success was minimal with two museums visited over a period of one hour and 38 minutes. One was the Fogg museum, an eclectic collection ranging from ancient wooden clocked madonnas, 18th century paintings of nudes in their harems to van Gogh with his ears on. The second museum (thank heavens it was right across the street) I have forgotten the name of featured an exhibit on Degas. In Paris, I was accustomed to see Degas paintings and pastels, bursting with colors and sensuous upright ballerinas along with their arabesques. There were also mazes of peach colored women's backs offering themselves to the eye as they curled their serpentine spine in an unconscious reverence. The exhibit in Boston had the same subject matter, but it was all etches of charcoal on paper. Most of the pieces were the black and white studies for the oil paintings and pastels shown in Paris. It was refreshing, a different aspect of Degas whose trembling, faltering lines nonetheless capture perfectly the sweep of an opera singer's hand, or the delicate torsion of a ballerina's waist. But these could have had better exposure had they been set off by some of the finished paintings and pastels, as the simple, roughness of the stone is sublimated by the diamond within it.
Posted by Aventurina King at 23:48:55 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

ke ke xi li

Ke ke xi li begins with a murder. But it is not you're usual thriller's posh apartment+blood oozing+on the morrow white duck tape on the floor combination. In a desert of black sand, the dune less horizon line stretches forever and the wind slashes the ice sky with waves of dust. A zoom on a dark clump in the middle of the road reveals a car's front window and behind that a coal featured man. He turns his head to the left and there is another group of coal-featured men with guns. They tie him up at the back of a truck, and one night, as he is watching them slay and skin a Tibetan sheep in front of a fire, he too is killed with the same nonchalant and sudden stride. There are two murders, and the film pivots around the first one: the death of the Tibetan sheep. Or rather the film pivots around the haggard group of men that try to save these sheep from extinction (they are hunted for their fur). A journalist from Beijing is there to cover the daily lives of these protectors of nature. He has a round face, smooth as a newborn's with dark eyes; his features are wavelets in a serene sea. He integrates the group on one of its midnight raids for poachers with an all-accepting nod. But gradually, his brow is bent into a frown as he witnesses his subjects suffering and committing acts of increasing violence. They are wounded, they wound, capture poachers, abandon the captured in the cold desert as provisions and oil in their cars become too low for their own subsistence. But even then, their thirst for revenge over the murdered fauna champions and perversely pushes them on through the desert and leaves their guarantees for return behind. What struck me the most about the movie was the character of the journalist. He is of the warm, appealing type. Unlike the team of protectors, his features do not cut his face as a knife cuts into steel. The team moves on, recklessly almost without reflection, but his doubt becomes constant and he expresses it “how am I supposed to write this story?" he asks the leader of the team after he witnesses them selling off the sheep fur hidden underground by the poachers. That question is never answered. Which is strange is a film approved by the communist government (as all films shown in mainland china must be). It made me think back on the journalist figures in past communist films. They had the same initial professional expression, the same will to do their job well, report the truth (in most instances, how bad the guo min dang was to the people) and they did it. period. Their serene, concentrated expression is never corrupted by doubt. But this journalist is different, not only does he have doubts about the fulfillment of his mission, but he never resolves them. His brow remains a frown and the truth may have remained buried. For a government that so heavily relies on propaganda to opiate the Chinese masses and sustain their support, that a movie portraying a journalist struggling to reveal the truth should pass in national theatres is startling.
Posted by Aventurina King at 23:22:05 | Permanent Link | Comments (1) |