Tuesday, November 2, 2004

The Dawn of China’s Golden Age can’t subjugate (like) the Glory of Byzantium

Opinion on the bits of culture that have erred into my field of vision:


The Metropolitan Museum’s “Dawn of a Golden Age”.

The exhibit has usurped the space of last year’s “Glory of Byzantium” without comparing to it scalewise.  Where the hanging byzantine chandelier had squizzed people along the wall like blocking paste, clustering chinese earthenware, silk and glass objects cower behind glass panes as intimidating museum goers lean in. 
Lack of glamour aside, the exhibit is well enough assembled to make its point, thrust a fragment of truth in our thoughts.  The first sections prepare us to receive it. They string early periods of art influenced by the West, South … (you name it).  The following, last and most impressive section (a massive buddha and exquisitly garnished boddhisatvas almost challenge the Byzantine chandelier), reveals the flourishing Tang period pieces.  Our by now expert eye can pick out the foreign influences that assemble into its distinctively chinese style.  Point being: what is chinese today wasn’t chinese in the first place.  I get it.

Posted by Aventurina King in 23:57:56 | Permalink | No Comments »

Fluttering Manifesto

    I DECLARE this blog born.  Like an infant, it will toddle around, slant its head to one side and let its large eyes set on anything that catches its attention.  It likes art.  Art glitters amid thousands of published words and the infant naively blows its opinion away to flutter among the clouds of letters. 

    Presentation of the infant:  Young french woman, university student not only sucked into New York’s culture but sucking it in, and blowing it out (through this blog).  

Posted by Aventurina King in 23:25:42 | Permalink | No Comments »